Clients may now engage lawyers in Singapore under conditional fee agreements – Part Two
This is the second part of a two-part article on the recent law passed in Singapore on allowing conditional fee agreements. Basic information about CFAs such as what are CFAs and in what situations CFAs can be used in Singapore is contained in part one of this article.
Ministry of Law in its press release in Nov 2021 which was issued in line with its introduction of the relevant Bill explained the reasons for initiating this change in Singapore law that now permits CFAs in certain situations:
- CFAs will enhance access to justice especially for businesses and individuals who may otherwise not pursue meritorious claims;
- CFAs may discourage lawyers from pursuing weak and frivolous claims since they risk receiving no or much lower fees if the claim is unsuccessful;
- Singapore lawyers will be better able to compete with lawyers in other jurisdictions who are already able to offer CFAs to their clients.
We must remember that a CFA is just a type of contract between the lawyer and his/her client regarding his/her fees. As such, CFAs must be in writing and signed by the client.
CFAs are not intended to replace traditional fee structures. Fees charged under CFAs are still subject to professional conduct rules against overcharging.
CFAs also do not absolve a lawyer from his/her professional conduct obligations to the client such as, advising his client if there is a high likelihood of getting a greater sum of damages through litigation rather than accepting the settlement offer on the table.
There will be safeguards that the Ministry of Law will introduce for the CFA framework via subsidiary legislation such as information that the lawyer must provide to his/her client before entering the CFA with the client, terms and conditions of a CFA etcetera.
In a recent press article Mr. Tong was quoted as explaining that in Singapore as the CFAs do not apply to indigent litigants for now, there is no need to impose any limits on uplift fees but if the CFA framework is expanded to cover other types of cases beyond what is permissible now, this will be a fresh consideration which the Ministry of Law will review at the appropriate time.
Read part one of this article which contains basic information about CFAs such as what are CFAs, who can use them and in what types of proceedings.
Copyright © 2021 ATLaw Practice LLP. All Rights Reserved.










Business Permits and Licenses: Different sectors may require specific licenses to operate. Some examples are highlighted here. Trading and shipping businesses require TradeNet licenses. Event management businesses require Arts Entertainment Licences for plays and copyright permits to reproduce copyright at events.
Business Contracts

Legal & Regulatory Compliance

The EDB, a government agency under the Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry, is responsible for strategies that enhance Singapore’s position as a global centre for business, innovation, and talent. EDB supports investment promotion and industry development, and works with international businesses, both foreign and local, by providing information, connection to partners and access to Singapore government incentives for their investments. To get more information about the EDB and contact details of its offices across the world, visit their website at 



Even though you and other SMEs might see an increase in operating costs to comply with these new amendments, it far outweighs the cost of any potential data breach. Not only have the fines for breaches been increased with this Amendment (up to 10% of annual gross turnover in Singapore, or SGD 1 million, whichever is higher), but it will also take more time to restore your company’s reputation and credibility once it has been publicly fined and flagged out.
Notification and opt-out – where individuals have been reasonably notified and given a reasonable period to opt out. Here your organisation has to conduct assessments on the risks of collecting, using and disclosing personal data and establish reasonable measures to eliminate such risks before actually collecting, using and disclosing such personal data. Individuals still retain the right to withdraw their consent subsequently.

If your business is transferring data to overseas hosting servers, please take note if the laws in the receiving country are comparable or better than that of the PDPA. If they are not, please include contractual obligations for the hosting servers to provide protection comparable to the PDPA. You might be pleased to note that with recent amendments to the Act, companies can now look for overseas hosting servers/organisations with “specified certification”. Overseas receiving organisations which have either of the two specified certifications, namely the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Cross Border Privacy Rules (APEC CBPR) System and the APEC Privacy Recognition for Processors (APEC PRP) System,automatically satisfy the PDPA’s section 26 obligation.